Rockwood
Well-known member
- May 5, 2021
- 5,014
- 6,370
Nicely done on the soap box car. Are they spec chassis you set up and a lot comes down to setup, small parts improvements and driving?While I agree with you in principle. I’d disagree that you think this is the case with Robby, Todd & Speed. Sure they jumped in the deep end and even Robby has admitted this was a bigger undertaking then he first though it would be. But I think they have forge through it way better then even the most experienced could have.
I don’t see them as over their heads. If they were trying building their own factory’s, and not using the experience CM’s they are. If they were rushing to market and overlooking the quality or testing, then I might agree with you. Not once have Todd or Robby used the supply chain issues as an excuse to not delivering. That’s a fact, and everyone and their brother has used that excuse. Lastly you feel they are out of touch and in a death spiral. Clearly we don’t agree with this. There are way smarter people involved then you & I, and their manufacturing partners would not have invested the millions they have, and be continuing down this path if it was a death spiral. The Chinese way would be to have to fall on their own sword if they lost on an investment like this. They would have put an end to this whole production if they thought it was a death spiral or suicide.
And the idea that this is taking to long. It’s actually a “engineering marvel” (remember that phase) in what they have done is such a short time. Maybe it’s seems long because of the transparency and since we have known about the project since day 1. Most products we don’t know about until they are ready to go to market. We don’t know the time line it took to get there? We do know it took Polaris longer to develop the Pro R and then they sat on it for well over a year because of Covid and the supply chain.
Here are a few examples I can share if other companies time lines. We build the ultra cap module for BRP’s snow sled starting system. Their engineers and ours are working on a smaller module for the 2024 line up. They are working on the 2024 design and we all know it’s only going to be small refinements, not a whole new ground up sled.
About 3 years ago we did a module for Hyundai/Kia. It’s going into a “black box” of sorts that will record crash data and also runs cameras in the car to record front & rear crash video. It was said they are developing this type of stuff and it could take 5 years before it’s seen in a production car.
Lastly and this is a cool one. This past week I was in Akron OH for the Soap Box Derby Championship that my daughter was racing in. One of the kids we had to race, his dad was works for Ford at the Cleveland engine plant where the Eco Boost engines are made. John is the cylinder head div manager. Another guy at the races who’s son was racing was in quality control for Ford in Michigan. Can’t remember his name? Some how these two guys paths met at the races. Anyways we got to talking and because I’m from Cali the Michigan guy was asking me about off road racing and which eventually lead to Robby Gordon, and this guy knew about this Speed UTV thing. He’s been watching it on & off. They have Polaris 800 & 900 they ride the trails around the family home. The Michigan guy was telling John the engine plant guy how Robby is building this vehicle including the engine, trans, and the car is expected to be released this year and it’s only been 2 1/2 years to do the whole project. This is the guy that said this project is an “Engineering Marvel” if it is what he’s seen on the videos? He said there is no way Ford could make a go kart in the time it’s taking to build this vehicle. I was telling him how they are using Arrington engines to develop the engine, which he knew from Dodge. And they were manufacturing overseas. John the cylinder head guy said it can take Ford 3-4 years just to do a engine & development and then there is no guarantee they end up using it. Transmissions can take twice as long to develop.
John asked me when were we leaving OH, and if I was sticking around this week? He said might be able to get me in the plant to show me around. But we were leaving on Sunday. He gave me the address and told me to drive by on my way to the airport, especially since my sister has a new Bronco and the Bronco engines come out of that plant. We also talked about the sh!tty water pump design the the 3.5lL engine in my wife’s Edge. Lol! Yes I’m still pissed about that one!!
My daughters in the white car. This was part of the Challenge race event.
View attachment 38301
Derby Championship track on Akron Oh.
View attachment 38302
Here we are losing to John’s son Garrett by .004 of a second. This knocked us out of making the second round which was our goal. This still hurts! Garrett went on to finish 4th in the Championship race out of the 72 in our Local Super Stock class.
View attachment 38303
Here is the Ford Cleveland engine plant.
View attachment 38304
Ford definitely wouldn't be able to get those parts or chassis out in that amount of time, but it has more to do with requirements than how amazing Speed is. Designing a passenger vehicle for people to drive every day for 100,000 miles and not be permanently pissed off at you all while complying with crash standards, unicorn magic emissions standards, CAFE, 60,000 mile powertrain warranty, and everything else is a big job. Every day the plant stops because of a fackup you didn't foresee costs the company $1M+. With the quantities they're ordering, performance requirements, and the cost targets they're hitting, there's no "whoops, we'll just re-deisgn it". I guarantee those engineers were more jealous than amazed at the speed (hehe, pun) of development and freedom to blank slate engineer. :biggrin:
I had an internship at Nissan in Gardena. Thought automotive engineering was going to be my gig. The horrors I saw there made me re-think my whole collegiate path, LOL. The design reviews, the bean counters forcing reiterations to shave ounces in the name of materials cost (not performance), the constant bureaucracy, re-utilization of existing tooling, cross-platform reviews, aesthetics, etc, etc, etc. Fack. That. I'm fairly certain that NSXs, GT500s, Z06 Vettes and other "Halo" cars are just as much morale boosters for engineers as they are for marketing, since most auto manufacturers rarely make money on them.
Engines and cylinder heads. Speed UTV's engineers have to worry about 4 things: power, driveability, reasonable reliability and manufacturing cost, and emissions. In that order. Reasonable reliability because 6 months is all you get, and most people think you're amazingly lucky to get 10 seasons with 10,000 miles out of a motor. Imagine if ANY auto manufacturer had an engine that only got 10,000 miles out of a powertrain. Driveability is important in a UTV, but Bert's service department probably isn't inundated with "it sounds funny" or "it clunks sometimes" or "something's rattling under the dash" service tickets, and Speed isn't going to have to buy it back if the customer brings it in 15 times because of it. Emissions, LOL. UTVs have nothing compared to passenger cars.
On top of that, there's fuel economy and NVH. Those Ford engineers are trying to make competitive horsepower and powerbands all while keeping all fussiness of this power generation away from the driver's butt and ears, making barely a whisper of pollution, and sipping fuel at the absolute minimum rate while not blowing up and staying under emissions thresholds.
So yeah, not apples to apples. Not even close. :biggrin:
Last edited by a moderator: