Blackjack
New member
- May 23, 2022
- 7
- 5
Hey all. I have been duning for going on 20 years, most of that time in a SXS. I have always been envious of sand cars. Big shocks, big power, big comfort. I have my SXS built to the hilt, but I know it is no match for a sand car. Realizing I'm not getting any younger, I have seriously started looking at sand cars, but I am realizing that I don't know jack chit about what I need to be looking for. So many brands, and I only know the reputation of big builders. I assume there are well built lesser known brands that exist, but maybe not. I have talked to different builders, and they make it sound like other (big name) builders cars "just don't work" in the dunes. They don't turn, ride like crap, blah, blah, blah. Makes me feel like if I don't have $150K plus to spend, then I should just move it along. I would like to say that I have unlimited funds, but the reality is that I need to find a decent used car, preferably under $75K. So much research, so little time....
Seems in this price range that the 2D transaxle rules the roost. This brings me to one of my endless questions. Everyone in the know seems to have the same opinion of the 2D; you have to handle it like a china doll. Does this mean 2D cars aren't as much fun because you are always concerned with babying the clutch/trans? I pin my RZR through the whoops (big turbo) hitting 75+ MPH and the trans is the last thing I am thinking about. Will it be the experience I imagine in my head it will be if the transmission is always on the cusp of giving up the ghost? I have considered just kicking down for a S4D if/when I do pick up a car, but then I consider that in addition to the cost of the car and new trans, there would also be fab costs, as I assume they mount differently. A welder I'm not, so I would absolutely have to pay for the fabrication. I know purchasing a sand car is likely one of the worst things you could probably ever spend money on, but if I'm going to do it, I at least want it to be an "educated" approach. So, I guess to summarize, should I just factor in the cost of an S4D once I find the car I want, as it most likely will have a 2D. Not sure this would even makes sense to do though.
Seems in this price range that the 2D transaxle rules the roost. This brings me to one of my endless questions. Everyone in the know seems to have the same opinion of the 2D; you have to handle it like a china doll. Does this mean 2D cars aren't as much fun because you are always concerned with babying the clutch/trans? I pin my RZR through the whoops (big turbo) hitting 75+ MPH and the trans is the last thing I am thinking about. Will it be the experience I imagine in my head it will be if the transmission is always on the cusp of giving up the ghost? I have considered just kicking down for a S4D if/when I do pick up a car, but then I consider that in addition to the cost of the car and new trans, there would also be fab costs, as I assume they mount differently. A welder I'm not, so I would absolutely have to pay for the fabrication. I know purchasing a sand car is likely one of the worst things you could probably ever spend money on, but if I'm going to do it, I at least want it to be an "educated" approach. So, I guess to summarize, should I just factor in the cost of an S4D once I find the car I want, as it most likely will have a 2D. Not sure this would even makes sense to do though.