Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was thinking the same thing.After looking into the claims of the new X3 having a thicker roll cage tubing and the chassis being 30% stronger, the lower A arms being stronger, the rear radius rod mounting support being stronger, the “Double Sheer” outer rear hub assembly. This car has to have gained a substantial amount of weight just because of this, not including the bigger, heavier tires that are standard now on all trims.
Looking up the specs of a 21 X3 base model , and RC RR vs. those same trims in 22 and I find out both model years weigh exactly the same? That’s impossible? Even for CARB the cars will have to be weighed as part of the recertification.
So either Can Am is not honest on the specs they advertise for their vehicles, which is a No, No! Or as they might claim if called out, “a typo” Or they are not honest with the claims of all these strength improvements? 30% stronger chassis for Can Am is a huge number. I hope they will share and prove these claims?
I don't think Can Am has updated the specs on the website. 30% thicker roll cage puts the thickness around .085, which is a big improvement. I am still trying to figure out what they did to the frame. Maybe thicker gussets or a few more gussets. It is hard to tell. The claim the frame is 13% more rigid, which is a good thing. Less flex and maybe less cracks.After looking into the claims of the new X3 having a thicker roll cage tubing and the chassis being 30% stronger, the lower A arms being stronger, the rear radius rod mounting support being stronger, the “Double Sheer” outer rear hub assembly. This car has to have gained a substantial amount of weight just because of this, not including the bigger, heavier tires that are standard now on all trims.
Looking up the specs of a 21 X3 base model , and RC RR vs. those same trims in 22 and I find out both model years weigh exactly the same? That’s impossible? Even for CARB the cars will have to be weighed as part of the recertification.
So either Can Am is not honest on the specs they advertise for their vehicles, which is a No, No! Or as they might claim if called out, “a typo” Or they are not honest with the claims of all these strength improvements? 30% stronger chassis for Can Am is a huge number. I hope they will share and prove these claims?
The bump steer can vary from car to car. My 2018 was horrible and I had to put on a bump steer tire rod kit. It helped a lot. Not sure on my 2021 as I have not driven other than around the block. Shock Therapy has a newer kit that comes with multiple spacers to fine tune.Was thinking the same thing.
And what about the crazy amount of bump steer those cars have, was that at all addressed?
haha, yes the KRX. The 2 seat is a beast for general offroad and rock crawling for what it is. We did a trip to moab and the Teryx 4 and the KRX were everywhere.Did you mean Kawasaki KRX, 4 seat? If so I think the KRX would make for a great 4 seater. I do think they would have to bump up the power. Does not have to be Turbo’ed (would be nice) but it will need more then 113 hp. This could be what holds them back? I did hear Kawasaki is committed to the sport market and we could see something else from them for a 2023 model?