Today at 3:45 PM #21 Sutton Member Joined Nov 19, 2025 Messages 58 Reaction score 35 acefuture said: 8.50 fronts, 33 rears. Done View attachment 136077 Click to expand... Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size.
acefuture said: 8.50 fronts, 33 rears. Done View attachment 136077 Click to expand... Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size.
Today at 6:34 PM #22 Jtmoney714 Well-known member Joined May 6, 2021 Messages 978 Reaction score 879 Sutton said: Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size. Click to expand... They match up well with the 33 blasters. Definitely would want a good spindle.
Sutton said: Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size. Click to expand... They match up well with the 33 blasters. Definitely would want a good spindle.
15 minutes ago #23 acefuture Well-known member Joined Jun 8, 2021 Messages 389 Reaction score 662 Sutton said: Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size. Click to expand... Yea, they look and work great. But I snapped a combo spindle with 10.75s. So I would hesitate to go to that size. To each there own. Plenty of guys running a 10.75 with combos
Sutton said: Would you ever consider the 10.75 fronts? I'm curious how they would do on a car this size. Click to expand... Yea, they look and work great. But I snapped a combo spindle with 10.75s. So I would hesitate to go to that size. To each there own. Plenty of guys running a 10.75 with combos