BaBaBouy
Well-known member
- May 6, 2021
- 654
- 1,138
Would life improve for the folks consumed with how much money “the rich” have if government stepped in, confiscated the money and redistributed it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many more countries or societies need to fail using Socialism before people realize it doesn't work?
I’ve debated socialism / communism with Progressives on Twitter countless times (you could actually count the times if you wanted). When I explain the concept of “each according to his ability, each according to his need” and how that includes accountability in individual effort, personal responsibility and a debt to the collective Progressives go into a rage.Here is the real issue.
People in the U.S. get taught "theory". Schools teach the "theory" of communism and socialism. By "theory", it's a great system. We all live together in peace and harmony. Everyone contributes and we are all equal. This is why young people are all for this. They are never taught history or reality.
Now..."Reality", it will never work as it does require a hierarchy and people in charge. Of course those people will always give themselves more. It also does not take into account that just as you have good, hardworking people, "man" is also has those that are takers and and who are lazy. That requires the other to carry their load and
Not so crazy and argued since the 60's..Don't give a fuck about other people's $$, but having the top 1% own 30% of our nation's wealth seems somewhat less than ideal, especially the top .1% given the outsized influence they hold on our society. See this guy for reference:
View attachment 134256
Should better health coverage only be for the rich and for people that have none?Would life improve for the folks consumed with how much money “the rich” have if government stepped in, confiscated the money and redistributed it?
Should the people that pay for better healthcare for everyone have a say in the life choices poor people make? If the goal is to cut down / eliminate disparity in health shouldn’t we also address lifestyle?Should better health coverage only be for the rich and for people that have none?
I believe the money is better spent in the hands of those who earned it than it would be in the hands of government.Don't give a fuck about other people's $$, but having the top 1% own 30% of our nation's wealth seems somewhat less than ideal, especially the top .1% given the outsized influence they hold on our society. See this guy for reference:
View attachment 134256
I'll be that guy.Should better health coverage only be for the rich and for people that have none?
With the advent of modern medicine and the widespread use of C-sections, this limitation is less absolute. Babies with larger heads or broader shoulders, which might have posed significant risks to both the baby and mother during vaginal delivery, are more likely to survive and reproduce. Over generations, this could lead to incremental changes in average brain size or cranial capacity in humans, though it’s a complex and long-term process involving many factors.
And those on the receiving end will waste it quickly....as you say...it's a mindset and something they are born with.Even if you redistributed all of it the same guys would get it all back quickly.. it’s a mindset and something they are born with..
RD
It was a great movie
There are exceptions, Billie Rae Valentine (Capricorn) comes to mind but they are outliers.And those on the receiving end will waste it quickly....as you say...it's a mindset and something they are born with.