.

madweazl said:
Can't speak for all but your Federal employees and military members have credit cards (aka company cards) to execute their jobs. You don't send a Lance Corporal that makes fuck all for a salary to another country to do his job on his own dime. You provide them with a company card to purchase the plane ticket, lodging, rental car, meals etc..
Click to expand...
Some Federal branches are full on retarded

Ex- Wife had a "Company" card. It was only to be used for plane tickets to OKC, because anyplace else she could fly for free and she wouldn't need to fly anyplace else for work so, basically for all flights or Hotel / Rental Car Reservations. She would only get reimbursed after she returned the car, stayed in the hotel and completed her flight, yet she would have to carry a zero balance on the card each month. So, if she booked her flight in January but flew in July, she had to float the money herself. If she carried a balance on the card, she ae the interest and would get called into the boss's office to answer why. So, it was not a big deal for her to wait until the last minute to book, flights. Hotels and such would not ding your card until the day of at least but instead of a cheap flight to OKC it was a last minute one. One time she went to the airport without a reservation not even knowing if there was a flight, but she was on the clock for travel so might as well wait till the last second so the reimbursement check beat the CC statement.
 
THD said:
View attachment 138939
Click to expand...
While I agree people like to forget what was done in the past by "their" party, I would like to point out a slight difference. Clinton's EO was to happen over 3 years with the departments making the personnel decisions, not "overnight" indescrimently, with no insite into the impact of those losses. We are lossing alot of good workers, while the ones that really need to be removed are just riding this out, like they have always done.

Again, I agree the reduction needs to happen. I just don't think it is being done the right way for it truly to be successful.
 
D-n-Tyke said:
While I agree people like to forget what was done in the past by "their" party, I would like to point out a slight difference. Clinton's EO was to happen over 3 years with the departments making the personnel decisions, not "overnight" indescrimently, with no insite into the impact of those losses. We are lossing alot of good workers, while the ones that really need to be removed are just riding this out, like they have always done.

Again, I agree the reduction needs to happen. I just don't think it is being done the right way for it truly to be successful.
Click to expand...

^ ^ ^ ^ was also congressionally approved
 
I agree cuts are absolutely necessary and our Govt spending is out of control. However, I would like to see better planning and selections on the cuts. I work for a large defense contractor and our number one customer is the Navy. They are losing all their best Contracting officer's and most experienced people to the buy-out. They were already short in this area. Now they are talking about having to cancel or delay some despretly needed work because they don't have the people to manage it. This will directly effect our defense readiness at a time when we are facing real threats from China, the middle-east and elsewhere.
 
Different Depts are taking a stance on emails (List yore top 5 daily work duties performed well) getting shotgun broadcasted across all of .GOV

LOL - Its funny to see everything from "Do Not Reply" to "Comply or be terminated" from group to group.


Rollercoaster ride for sure these days
 
Last week Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem warned employees that polygraph tests will be used to help crack down on rogue leakers that have been foiling immigration agents.

The leaked information reportedly allowed members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to evade capture in at least one of the raids.

And already, a number of leakers have been identified and fired.

Noem said on Fox:

I have found some leakers. We are continuing to get more. They will be fired. There will be consequences.

And remember, when they leak information to the press in order to blow an op, they are putting law enforcement lives in jeopardy. They are risking their lives and putting their families in the position where they'll have to live without those individuals any further.

So you bet we have used every tactic that we have. If you remember we talked just last week about how I'm using polygraphs to go after, and to really interview these folks. Because we are a national security agency, I have that tool I can use -- also looking at their emails, looking at their communications. And it's amazing how these bureaucrats, who have an agenda to stop the work that we're doing to bring safety to America, how they will sell each other down the river if it's just to protect themselves.

So don't worry, I am doing everything to find these leakers and to get rid of them so that we can do our work and our law enforcement officers and agents can do it safely.
 
This is what all the idiots are doing :cry::cry::cry::mad::mad::mad:o_Oo_Oo_O

The smart ones are figuring out what services the Government will be in need of in like 6 months and are getting a team together, starting a business and getting ready to make some money in the private sector.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top