HozayKwarvo
Forum Moderator
- May 1, 2021
- 722
- 1,388
How do the greens most frequently shut down off-road recreation areas? Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and many others have been successful in closing riding areas across the nation by using the rules and regulations to their advantage… and getting paid to do it!
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (federal law) allows groups to get reimbursed their legal fees in cases they win against the government and the federal land managers (like BLM). The CBD is basically a group of lawyers that get paid (reimbursed their own fees) by winning litigation against government agencies for not managing the public lands.
The ISDRA is managed with the Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP), NEPA, CDCA, etc and other federal regs taken into account.
When the BLM or any other federal land manager doesn’t uphold the requirements of the RAMP (and other regs) they can be sued for non-compliance. Getting sued takes time and money… time and money that should be used managing the lands and complying with the regulations …so they get stretched thing while fighting litigation and …start circling the drain… as resources get thin they likely miss a few additional requirements, get sued again… essentially bankrupting the agency from being able to effectively manage the lands, then the gates get closed and the recreation area is no more.
It’s more technical than that, but in a nutshell, anything that diverts resources away from the already bureaucratic and inherently inefficient federal land managers puts our riding area at risk.
Intentions do not matter. When it comes to litigation it’s not subjective, it’s black and white - compliant or non-compliant.
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (federal law) allows groups to get reimbursed their legal fees in cases they win against the government and the federal land managers (like BLM). The CBD is basically a group of lawyers that get paid (reimbursed their own fees) by winning litigation against government agencies for not managing the public lands.
The ISDRA is managed with the Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP), NEPA, CDCA, etc and other federal regs taken into account.
When the BLM or any other federal land manager doesn’t uphold the requirements of the RAMP (and other regs) they can be sued for non-compliance. Getting sued takes time and money… time and money that should be used managing the lands and complying with the regulations …so they get stretched thing while fighting litigation and …start circling the drain… as resources get thin they likely miss a few additional requirements, get sued again… essentially bankrupting the agency from being able to effectively manage the lands, then the gates get closed and the recreation area is no more.
It’s more technical than that, but in a nutshell, anything that diverts resources away from the already bureaucratic and inherently inefficient federal land managers puts our riding area at risk.
Intentions do not matter. When it comes to litigation it’s not subjective, it’s black and white - compliant or non-compliant.
Last edited by a moderator: