Lord of the Dunes
Well-known member
- May 5, 2021
- 1,864
- 1,506
It's how ignorant they are. For example I know a libtard who is actually open minded - he asked me a lot of questions and seemed really surprised by my answers - all he knew was that CNN told him we need to stop burning hydrocarbons immediately and pay more taxes to fix the problem. He thought that all greenhouse gasses were caused by human sources, etc. He didn't know that natural sources of methane are 20x -80x more potent GGs than CO2, depending on who you talk to. I tend to believe 20x, since 80x I've only heard from one source.
Fortunately, every time we talked, we both had computers so when he asked me a question, he could verify my answer, since he thought I was a lying Trump supporter. Of course I couldn't help but tweak his mind by asking him why he was going to vote for Biden and he wasn't allowed to mention Trump. After a few seconds of silence, he burst out laughing, admitting, "You got me! I hate Trump! That's it!" I pointed out to him that only an emotional little b1tch votes like that. :lol:
Back to climate change. He didn't know anything about LFTR nuclear reactors, offshore wind power or the fact that the earth is a self balancing (kind of) closed loop system. In regards to the CO2->O2 loop, as CO2 levels rise, trees grow more leaves naturally and consume more CO2 and produce more O2, with no input from us, just like rabbit populations rise from greater food sources. He was also surprised to learn that the NASA climate change analysis that he kept referring to had underestimated natural methane sources by a factor of 10. Even after they corrected for that, they completely left out the natural greening self balancing factor in their calculations. I use the term calculations very loosely, since all of their projections were based on guesses or estimates of global CO2 generation, methane sources and quantity.
Now it turns out the foremost think tank in the world is stating that the fastest/best way to counter climate change isn't to stop driving cars or burning hydrocarbons. The fastest way to cure the problem is to plant more trees and plants, especially in urban areas. Only 3% of the earth's surface is covered in jungles and that was higher up until recently. We need to grow a lot more trees, which will absorb the CO2 and convert it to O2, which we need.
Fortunately, every time we talked, we both had computers so when he asked me a question, he could verify my answer, since he thought I was a lying Trump supporter. Of course I couldn't help but tweak his mind by asking him why he was going to vote for Biden and he wasn't allowed to mention Trump. After a few seconds of silence, he burst out laughing, admitting, "You got me! I hate Trump! That's it!" I pointed out to him that only an emotional little b1tch votes like that. :lol:
Back to climate change. He didn't know anything about LFTR nuclear reactors, offshore wind power or the fact that the earth is a self balancing (kind of) closed loop system. In regards to the CO2->O2 loop, as CO2 levels rise, trees grow more leaves naturally and consume more CO2 and produce more O2, with no input from us, just like rabbit populations rise from greater food sources. He was also surprised to learn that the NASA climate change analysis that he kept referring to had underestimated natural methane sources by a factor of 10. Even after they corrected for that, they completely left out the natural greening self balancing factor in their calculations. I use the term calculations very loosely, since all of their projections were based on guesses or estimates of global CO2 generation, methane sources and quantity.
Now it turns out the foremost think tank in the world is stating that the fastest/best way to counter climate change isn't to stop driving cars or burning hydrocarbons. The fastest way to cure the problem is to plant more trees and plants, especially in urban areas. Only 3% of the earth's surface is covered in jungles and that was higher up until recently. We need to grow a lot more trees, which will absorb the CO2 and convert it to O2, which we need.